> Home > Alaska Action Alerts > Knik River PUA Comments Extended Until October 15th.

Knik River PUA Comments Extended Until October 15th.

Action needed by 15, 2008

From Katy Nilsson, via the Bioneers Network:

We have a serious problem in our backyard.

The Alaska Department of Natural Resources has, in essence, turned ALL of the Knik River Valley Public Use Area over to motorized use only. The DNR is permitting unlimited running in the uplands and 6” tire depth in the wetlands!!!

The DNR has made no consideration for nonmotorized use, no protection for the salmon spawning streams, no preservation of the waterfowl feeding/breeding grounds, no buffer for those who live year-round on neighboring land.

There was an interim plan that was pretty decent. But ATV users made an end-run around public process. Their bypass involved the Alaska Outdoor Council, Alaska Senator Charlie Huggins, who is Resources Committee Chair, and Tom Irwin, who is Commissioner of Alaska’s Department of Natural Resources.

Now, we, the bypassed public, have until September 24th, this coming Wednesday, to respond. (Extended until October 15th)

For me, the most unconscionable part of this plan is unlimited rutting in the uplands. Already, a part of this area that was once a fragile, beautiful ecosystem has been turned into “the dunes” with no remaining vegetation, only piles of sand. And folks who live across the road from this public area can see chutes of dust come down off the ATV trails. Each trail has its own plume of dust.

Now, today, the wetlands are a spider’s web of ATV trails. ATV users now drive all the way to the glacier and then some use the glacier for target practice.

We Bioneers ought to be fighting mad about this. We ought to be stirred to action. We don’t need to travel to Washington, D.C. to fight for our wild lands. We have a fight on our hands right here, in our backyard. “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. “ Martin Luther King, Jr.

Take Action:

Read the regulations at www.knikriver.alaska.gov. See if this is what you want for Knik River Valley.

To make a difference, contact the DNR commissioner: Tom.Irwin@alaska.gov - 269-8431 Work phone

More Information:

DNR needs to reconsider Knik River plan

By Gregory Nilsson and Brit Lively
Spectrum
Published on Thursday, September 18, 2008 9:35 PM AKDT

It is common knowledge that Knik River Valley has been sacrificed to unbridled abuse for almost 30 years despite long-term attempts by residents to stop the chaos and destruction. Now it’s official. Our surroundings, whose waters form the northern-most birthplace of the Pacific Ocean, are condemned to motor park status with Alaska Department of Natural Resources Commissioner Tom Irwin’s signature on the Management Plan for the Knik River Public Use Area (KRPUA).

While new, non-motorized trails may be created in the future after DNR’s Trail Management Planning, at this time there is not even one trail for the use of quiet recreation that doesn’t have to be shared with motorized users. Not one trail where a horseback rider can be assured of not having to jump out of the way of an ATV. Not one trail without ruts, dust or noise, and not one where a family can walk through the woods pushing baby in a stroller or Grandpa in a wheel chair.

Numerous comments were sent in requesting that some separation of uses occur in the area. Why were these not considered in the plan? ADNR has gone overboard with motorized uses and compromise is lacking.

In addition, new regulations will allow disturbance of vegetation, an activity that is prohibited statewide because it is destructive to the environment. What will continue to happen in the Knik River Valley: no one gets charged, unless they get caught digging their “excavator tires” 6 inches or more into the vegetation. In the high-use area of Upper/Lower Knik Flats (from Knik River to beyond Jim Creek ), unlimited rutting is allowed, taking away all hopes of restoring vegetation and land already destroyed in the forests, wetlands and dunes.

Requests by many residents for buffers from the motorized chaos on beaches and forests adjoining their properties were rejected in this plan. DNR intends to locate a shooting area within earshot of most residents and an elementary school! Unrestricted camping on the beach and in the forests adjoining private properties will continue to expose residents to fires and vandalism. No assurance of quiet picnics or walks on the beach without being accompanied by four-wheeler nuisance. Ever.

The stated purpose in legislation that created the KRPUA (HB 307) regarding non-motorized activities was ignored in the management plan. The legislation states: “ … provide an area for the public to enjoy the full spectrum of public uses, including maintenance and enhancement of off-road motorized vehicle and nonmotorized recreational opportunities …”

Enhancement of non-motorized recreational opportunities does not mean the taking for motorized use those trails on land and water that, for decades, were built, improved, used and cared for by groups and individuals. These horseback riders, mushers, birdwatchers and others enhanced the recreational opportunities for all borough residents. The concept of multi-use 30 years ago was to allow users to get from point A to B on a three-wheeler or a truck for fishing and hunting, but we don’t believe it means a rutted moto-cross venue.

Many residents of Knik River Valley, along with former users who are afraid to visit the area, trusted that the planning process would finally restore sanity to the area. They also trusted that this process would not cater to those who shouted the loudest at public meetings. Individuals and families of all recreational persuasions would like to return and enjoy this beautiful area without conflict.

We suggest that disenfranchised users and residents of the Knik River Valley contact Commissioner Irwin by Sept. 24 and request that he reconsider his decision on the basis that the KRPUA Management Plan does not comply with the stated purpose of HB 307 and does not address mitigation measures that protect the adjoining community and residents from adverse effects and spillovers of the KRPUA.

Other issues with the plan can be appealed as well through this reconsideration process. The public really has not been listened to. You can view the documents and regulations at www.knikriver.alaska.gov. You can e-mail Mr. Irwin at tom.irwin@alaska.gov ; 269-8431.

Gregory Nilsson & Brit Lively write on behalf of Butte Area Residents Civic Organization, www.buttealaska.org.